Wednesday, 25 November 2009

Why Indian men can’t dance


I’m putting myself at risk of being labelled a man-hater for saying this. But it’s true – Indian men, at least the lecherous, pot-bellied middle-aged ones, cannot dance. In fact, they should not be allowed to dance or even step into a nightclub. And before you label me - let me tell you, I have a good reason for what I say.

A few weekends ago, my girlfriends and I went out dancing on a Saturday night. The mood was giggly, the hope was for an evening of dancing and some good, clean fun. So with our sparkly tops in place and favourite perfumes wafting in the air, we headed into one of the numerous clubs dotting London’s West End.

At first, it was all as expected – top-tapping music and some serious bogeying on the dancing floor. About half an hour into our evening, we had some new arrivals at the club. You guessed it – we were invaded by a gang of Indian men. Now, I am Indian and like most things Indian – with these particular exceptions.

Allow me to describe these men and their behaviour. They were all in their mid-forties. They all wore the bush-shirt and Polyester trousers uniform favoured by their generation. And, here’s the killer, they all wore identical lustful expressions, like villains from a 70s Bollywood film.

They muscled their way into the heaving dance floor. The only part of their bodies that moved or danced were their elbows – which moved like parts of machinery that hadn’t been oiled for a while. But mostly they stood and stared, just stared with mouths gaping at every woman on that dance floor. Thank God it was dark or else we’d probably see the saliva dribbling out of their mouths.

Having spotted me on the floor – I look Indian – one of the men turned to me and his lascivious grin grew even wider. Me Indian, you Indian – it seemed to say. In your wildest dreams buddy, I thought to myself. I gave him my deadliest ‘I’ll kill you’ glare. It seemed to work, as he turned his attention back to the other women.

By now, the men didn’t restrict themselves to just looking. They sidled up to various women on the floor and started to inch closer. A lot of the women, understandably horrified, left the floor. The only ones left were so drunk, they didn’t seem to care who was rubbing up against them.

By this point, my friends and I’d had enough of trying to evade the attentions of these creeps and trying to dance at the same time.

I mean seriously, did these guys really think that just by being at a club and grinning at women – they were going to get lucky. Maybe they come into places like this hoping that some woman is going to be drunk enough to go home with one of them. I can’t imagine that happening, no matter how much alcohol is involved.

My friends asked me at this point whether these guy were Indians. I would’ve liked to deny this vehemently as I am rather proud of my Indian heritage. But the truth prevailed and I said yes.

I felt ashamed – the country with centuries-old culture and rich traditions, the country that was zooming ahead as one of the most strongest economies of the world – surely that country could not have produced these idiots.

But as any woman who’s grown up in any Indian city will tell you – India does produces these pathetic little men in millions. As a young Indian girl growing into a woman, you learn the delicate art of maneuvering your body away from sweaty, grabbing hands on crowded streets and transport. And you learn this as instinctively as learning to eat or walk. The sad thing is – we all accept this as a fact of life, almost like the scorching sun in the afternoon or the fury of the season monsoons.

I mean, why is it that in a crowded European street – you’re not forced to use your handbag to defend your body from some Neanderthal jerk. Why is it that in India, we have given our men this unquestioned right to touch our bodies? What does that say about us and where we are going?

Just last week, I read in the papers about a pregnant women being thrashed and paraded naked in a village in Uttar Pradesh. All, for the unforgivable crime of trying to protect her property. After reading that, a few men groping women on a dance floor in London doesn’t seem like such a big deal. But ignoring is kind of like saying it’s ok, isn’t it? And it’s not you know – it really is not.

2 comments:

  1. Haven't we all had some of that? But I'd say here that there is a big difference between the men in Uttar Pradesh and those you met in the night club. The former are a dangerous lot who use their power to suppress the women around them and the latter are just pathetic and severely repressed. The most they can do is gape and grope. If we took them to task they'd just scurry off somewhere and hide. The thing is we Indian women don't do that very often!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello, I was looking an online forum/post to comment on regarding this general topic. Indian (South Asian) people are just as bad if not worse rhythmically challenged than white people in general. I'm not talking of pre-choreographed dances, but freeform innovative dances. I have lived in urban America with large populations of blacks (American, Caribbean and Africans), Latinos (white, black, native, mixed), East Asians, whites, South Asians, etc. It is easy to spot out that blacks and Latinos are the best, Indians are the worst, regardless of fob/abcd/etc. It has to be genetic. Even in the internationalized Vaishnava movement, white people are showing Hindus how to dance freely and with rhythm to mridangams and khartals, so forget about Indians moving well to Western electronic/digital music. What is ironic about this though is that Indian classical music is the most rhythmic (including freeform/innovation), but somewhere in the transition of rhythm from fingers to spine, it has been lost among the masses. If black people had bhangra and dhols, there would be fifty different dance moves every year instead of the 5 or 6 moves that keep getting recycled (I'm having reason to suspect that bhangra originates from some dance form from Ethiopia/Somalia). So it isn't just the men that can't dance. I lucked out somehow. People tell me I have natural rhythm like someone from Africa. There are people of Afro ancestry in Indian subcontinent, but they're mostly Muslims (of course, these Afro-Indians are the best dancers in entire subcontinent). I'm Hindu Brahmin from Bengal, and at least on my face I don't have any sign of African mixture (I'm fair-skinned with narrow Caucasian nose and big upward slanted Indian eyes) but I do have a tall slender strong body with long limbs which might point to an African physique. I'm sorry for getting all racial here, but all my life, I find it funny when brown girls come hit on me at clubs but then they can't even bounce their knees to the beat. So the frustration goes both ways. I think at some point, those with rhythm began intimidating those without in Indian history, and by collective power of majority, they began making it "disrespectful" to move one's body. This is going deeper into history and philosophy of male-female balance and how religion was diverted from Goddess worship to progressively masculine deities of Krishna, Allah, Jehovah, etc. So homegirl, I think there's a lot deeper aspect to the question you brought up :)

    ReplyDelete